Tobacco often has carcinogens due to either the high-phosphate soil it is grown in which causes it to absorb naturally-occurring polonium, and/or the nitrosamines which result from a chemical reaction due to burning the tobacco and nicotine. The nicotine itself does not cause cancer. This means that if the government really does want people to quit the more hazardous forms of tobacco, they would push the safer alternatives like the gum and e-cigarettes. Tobacco companies should be careful as to what they put in their products, as the Swedes treat their oral tobacco the same way as food, and have fewer incidences of tobacco-related cancer.
There are two tobacco bills getting close to being law. One's getting close to be signed by the president, and while I like the idea of the FDA having control over what goes into oral and smoking tobacco, what I don't like is how products introduced after February 2007 would have to be pulled, even if they are likely or proven to be less harmful than the ones made before the cutoff date. Most if not all tobacco products created before then have a far higher carcinogen content than the newer ones.
I also disagree with outlawing most flavoured cigarettes because there are already laws that prohibit the sale of cigarettes to minors. If someone sells tobacco products to minors, he will get into trouble, as will the store selling the tobacco. As for anyone who buys tobacco for minors, maybe parents should start being responsible parents and paying attention to what their kids are doing, who they're hanging around with, etc. Whether or not the candy flavours attract new smokers is none of the government or anyone else's concern. What about the fruit-flavoured wine coolers and booze? Should that be outlawed as well to prevent kids from trying alcohol later in life and getting hooked? My business is mine, and your business is yours. And I've been given the old argument of tax-dollars being spent on healthcare for tobacco-related diseases, but I for one would rather be allowed to be responsible for my own health problems due to engaging in risky or stupid behaviour. I don't want your tax-dollars, just freedom.
The other one that I seriously hope doesn't pass makes most tobacco(except for cigars, for some odd reason) unmailable. It's all 'for the children', but parents, not the government, should be responsible for a kid's online activity. Making tobacco unmailable is not going to stop the problem, especially when it excludes cigars - people will likely just buy a few cigars, shred them, and then roll them into smaller cigarettes and sell them on the black market. And there are other ways people will get money from black market tobacco, since they can grow their own and make smokes or snuff. In the long run it may deprive the government of tobacco-derived tax money.
Worst of all, this PACT Act bill mentions terrorist groups making money from selling tobacco on the black market [link] but this law may actually make it easier for these groups to make money, since it robs honest, law-abiding shops of their customer base. It's a simple lack of competition, likely not intentional, just poorly thought-out. The alcohol prohibition didn't work, and neither will this.
Don't get me wrong - I'm all for lowering and eventually getting rid of smoking-related diseases, and keeping kids away from a product that can make them sick, but it is my belief that adults should be allowed to care for themselves and be adults. That includes being responsible and either choosing to not do something stupid, or to be prepared to suffer the consequences of a bad choice. I understand that tobacco(at least most of its consumable forms), junk food, fast food, and many other things are bad for people, but being an adult means taking responsibility for one's actions rather than blaming everyone else.
I will accept all input and thoughts on this, including all-caps flames. Your views will likely differ from mine but I won't take it personally.
Devious Comments
I agree with you completely (except for the part about shredding cigars. Cigars are gross XD well, I think they are anyway)
In the UK and I suspect where you live as well, smoking is really being attacked lately. Every time you switch on the TV, there are adverts geared towards discouraging smoking. Okay, I admit smoking is not healthy. But what about alcohol and junk food as you said? McDonald's burgers don't have big ugly health warnings on the packets with "Foods high in fat and mechanically recovered meat can seriously damage your health." XD It doesn't make sense. Why attack one thing and not the other? Why is it okay for companies to encourage buyers - including parents buying for children - to stuff fat into their bodies, but not cigarettes?
And you're quite right about parents looking after their own children. If the parents are providing the children with pocket money or whatever then they should be aware of what their kids are using it for.
By the way, how much do cigarettes cost over there? I'm sure the price is rising, but I'm curious to know. Over here, a packet of 20 costs about £5.50 these days, and an ounce of tobacco (eg. 25 grams) costs about the same. Double the number to get the approximate price in dollars.
In America, since the early-mid 90's we have been bombarded by anti-smoking commercials, including ones of cancer patients, and others that portray the tobacco companies as evil monsters who just want to enslave people. I think that that is enough, though I do believe that there might be some benefit in letting a child smoke a cigarette and feel how unpleasant it is. I mean, have you seen that Calvin & Hobbes comic where Calvin's mother lets him try a cigarette? He learned his lesson and never felt the desire to smoke ever again. These new laws are just acting as free advertisements, making cigarettes and other tobacco products look cooler because they have this forbidden fruit charm.
Ever hear about how some farmers get rid of old hay? The farmer simply takes the old, musty hay and places it outside the cow's enclosure, just within the animal's reach. The cow will ignore the hay placed in her pen, and crane her neck so she can have the 'forbidden' hay. If the government would leave the people alone and let them clean up their own messes, we probably wouldn't have problems like this today.
And cigarettes? I'm not sure how much a pack costs but some of them get pretty steep. I rarely if ever smoke - smokeless, spitless tobacco is better and can be used anywhere. Though just in case anything does happen and the safer smokeless tobacco disappears, I bought an e-cigarette kit that dispenses liquefied nicotine through an atomizer. Got it cheap too, with around 750 puffs of strong nicotine. Hopefully the device will still be legal after a year or so because it could really benefit people who have troubles with nicotine addiction.
The government does need to start paying attention to the trends though; the more restrictions it puts on these products, the more people will find ways around them. As for shredding cigars and making them into cigarettes, I think cigars have the same kind of tobacco in them as cigarettes, as the latter is just some shredded dried tobacco wrapped in paper. Tobacco seeds may become big business pretty soon, I'm betting, and people will likely find instructions on making the smoke or chew of their choice.
--
Open for commissions! Info here -> [link]
--
A comic's awesome factor directly correlates with kicking things in the face. -StarDragonBlue
WARNING: This deviant contains random acts of violence against Cyberdemons. You have been warned.
I joined WeLoveSwords and Saria-Club
--
Open for commissions! Info here -> [link]
--
A comic's awesome factor directly correlates with kicking things in the face. -StarDragonBlue
WARNING: This deviant contains random acts of violence against Cyberdemons. You have been warned.
I joined WeLoveSwords and Saria-Club
Besides that, women have the right to choose, why can't tobacco-users? We want to be able to enjoy our nicotine while lessening the risk for cancer. The government doesn't care about that - they just want to keep maligning tobacco and encouraging people to lay the blame on everyone but themselves.
We need to start protesting and trying to regain the liberties that have been surrendered. The tobacco companies have already had many of their rights to free speech and expression taken from them, and they need to have those rights back. Freedom of choice, freedom from benevolent tyranny of the nanny state.
--
Open for commissions! Info here -> [link]
Previous PageNext Page